Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

Re: [RC] 60, 64 pulse - rides2far

Doesn't pulse criteria, along with the length of vet checks 
technically fall under the responsibility of the head vet? (See 
rules 2.1.6 and 2.1.7)

That's where I'd like to see it stay. I think everyone likes to focus on
the easy to quantify *numbers*. It's easy to distinguish a 60 pulse, or a
30 min. hold, so they focus on that. If gut sounds were so simple they'd
get the attention they deserve. What about temps? I'll bet there's room
for improvement in the way we monitor that but it's just not as easy to
focus on as those basic numbers. What about length & number of holds? Bet
there's lots of people in the SE who think the # holds in the West sound
wrong...but we're not there, their vets are. AERC has always given the
vets at the ride room to adjust for weather, conditions, etc.

To tie this in with the ROC discussion. Which ROC winner's horse
recovered in about 59 minutes? I remember the story of how feverishly
they worked on him, but I'm not certain enough of who it was to state it.


Angie

Angie McGhee
http://www.lightersideofendurance.com


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp

Ride Long and Ride Safe!!

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=