Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

Re: [RC] re: musings - Dot Wiggins

I do think these things have mattered to the horses.
 
As these rules came into play there were some very "successful" riders who either went away or changed how they did things.  
They couldn't win if they had to ride without trashing the horse on the last loop.
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 5:33 AM
Subject: [RC] re: musings

Neat!  I woke up to see you guys actually having an interesting discussion on P/R and the things have really have improved.  Everyone brought up very interesting points.  Honestly, as I told Truman, sometimes I'm guilty of just loving to argue :)  I do agree with this list of improvements in principle:
In my mind the best things that ever happened to protect the horses during a ride were:
The pulse gate into hold at all checks.
The mandatory pulse recovery at the finish.
Sound at a trot at the finish.
DQ if horse needs treatment within an hour of finishing.
Still, it's interesting to try to figure out if it's "mattered" to horses' welfare overall.  No, I do not  think the AERC can change people's basic nature, that was factitious.  It is just interesting to see what these rules have changed and what they haven't and, as Truman would say, did they make any statistical difference. 



Cindy Collins





Replies
[RC] re: musings, Cindy Collins