Carla, this was exactly the way LD was
planned in its formation, but somehow it's become a battleground. Career
LD riders want something different than that which was planned in the beginning,
and herein lies the controversy.
Oh I don't know if I should say anything - I
really hesitate. Since I haven't even started a ride yet. But
that's my intention, and I'm a member of AERC, so ... I guess I'm as qualified
as anyone to speak up about something I know very little about.... (ok,
don't get your panties in a wad, that is a joke, not directed at anyone in
particular!)
Aren't the rules of AERC defining an
endurance ride as a distance of at least 50 miles?
I think it is wonderful that LD's are there for
us, for WHATEVER reason. As a training and/or conditioning ride, for new
and/or young horses, or for riders or horses who aren't as
physically strong, for people with less time, or just for fun!
But I don't expect the same rules to apply, as for an endurance ride -- that
is, a 50 miler or greater distance.
Am I wrong, here? If LD riders
really want to change the rules and definitions, then address the
board. But that would mean changing the very definition of endurance in
AERC, wouldn't it? If so, I'm NOT for it. LD's have their
place, and I certainly don't look down on the LDs or LD participants, but it's
just not the same as doing 50 + miles. And never will be.
Just my opinion.
