Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

Re: [RC] re: what's wrong with square one? - Truman Prevatt

marybenstover wrote:

You wrote:  I just think that the term "endurance" should not necessarily be limited to numbers.

The people that founded the AERC defined endurance as 50 miles or more.  To change that we would have to do an expensive bylaws change.  Another thing that no one seems to consider is that some of these very same people are still riding endurance and think the definition of "endurance" is just fine the way it is...........................mb

Actually Endurance Riding is defined to encompass two different events, an endurance ride and an limited distance ride. So according to our bylaws any one participating in an AERC sanctioned even, be it limited distance or endurance ride is participated in endurance riding. I have a very difficult time understanding all the fuss. We should all go ride our horses whatever distance we chose and support our organization. The next two years are going to be pretty challenging I suspect for recreational equestrian activities.

Truman

--
"There is always a well-known solution to every human problem--neat, plausible, and wrong

"There is always a well-known solution to every human problem--neat, plausible, and wrong." H. L. Mencken


Replies
Re: [RC] re: what's wrong with square one?, marybenstover