Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

Re: [RC] re: what's wrong with square one? - marybenstover

You wrote:  I just think that the term "endurance" should not necessarily be limited to numbers.

The people that founded the AERC defined endurance as 50 miles or more.  To change that we would have to do an expensive bylaws change.  Another thing that no one seems to consider is that some of these very same people are still riding endurance and think the definition of "endurance" is just fine the way it is...........................mb

[RC] re: what's wrong with square one?, Michelle Aquilino