From: ridecamp-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ridecamp-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of The
Coles Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 2:50 PM To:
ridecamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [RC] CRI's
I had posted this earlier, but go no
responses, so I'm trying again...
At a recent Limited Distance ride I
attended, we were asked a question by the Ride Vet (this was her first
"endurance" vetting) regarding CRI's
We explained to her that the CRI was
an indicater of cardiac recovery, and that the reflected values indicated "the
fitness of the horse to continue" and that the ideal numerical values we to
have the horse recover at, or below, the inital heart rate.
She then asked how to rate the
following CRI's (all CRI's were done at exactly the 10 min "called for pulse"
time)
58/52
44/44
38/39
This brought the discussion around to
which one was the best.... The 58/52 shows the best cardiac recovery,
while the 44/44 maintained, however the third horse at having an initial HR of
38 showed better pulse down rates. So, she was confused as to how to
rate the values for High Vet (yes, we offer High Vet at our small rides in our
neck of the woods).
Given that all other parameters were
equal, and based on your experience:
1) How would you rate the
three?
2) What would have been the best way
to explain this to her (and yes I know, she should have know the vet manual
front and back).
Thanks
Do not interfeet in the affairs of Dragons,
as you probably taste good with
ketchup...