Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

Re: [RC] WEG distance - should it change? - Barbara McCrary

On the other hand, our 75 has always had more riders than the 100 and drew THREE TIMES as many riders last year as the 100. Go figure....

Barbara

----- Original Message ----- From: "Truman Prevatt" <tprevatt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ridecamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 6:54 AM
Subject: Re: [RC] WEG distance - should it change?




There have been a lot of RM's that have offered a 75 one year but didn't continue with it since it didn't pan out. When I looked at the distribution of distances - the 75 to 95 mile distance was not only flat over the last 10 years but if you ignore 2 day 100's it is the smallest category in riders.

That's my story and I'm sticking to it! ;-)

Truman



=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp

Ride Long and Ride Safe!!

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


Replies
[RC] WEG distance - should it change?, Greenall
Re: [RC] WEG distance - should it change?, Truman Prevatt