Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

OT ...Re: [RC] If you are concerned about America's wild horses an... - Karen Sullivan

Ed, your "facts" are not what I consider facts, but some opinions ....my comments inserted below...
----- Original Message -----

<Before we go all teary eyed about the death of some unowned feral horses let us consider some of the facts relating to unowned animals in general, and horses in particular

  1. < This tremendous increase in human population requires that unowned animals must be managed so we have enough room to live and grow the food, including cows, we eat.
The first part of this is true (huge increase in human population, which is a problem in itself), but there may be far
more efficient ways to produce food for humans than running cattle on marginal rangeland that horses and other wildlife occupy.
  1. <. I personally, would not want the numbers of my horses controlled by wandering predators.
However having grazing animals preyed on by predators is a natural way to insure the strongest survive...in any
case, we are not talking about YOUR horses. 
  1. hunting is not a viable option to control horses
BLM has yet to try other methods of herd control such as sterilization....even when studies show this might be a far more cost effective way to control herds than the labor and cost intensive adoption program. Might be a viable option as well as adoption to QUALIFIED indivuduals.
  1. This supply of domestic horses, most of which are generally superior to wild horses for casual riding and ownership, limits the demand for captured wild horses.
Totally disagree with this, no facts to back this up, your opinion only...I have seen mustangs with faultless conformation, and domestic bred horses that can barely move. Give me a choice of a trained mustang to cover ground versis a halter QH? One only has to look at the horses Dr.Ottinger selects, or others such as Steens Vaquero to see great legs and conformaiton.

<Careful consideration of the above facts leads to the inescapable conclusion that we, through our government, will have to continue to remove many horses from the western range to protect the environment.

This may be true, however, there may be better alternatives than the sneaky bill introduced by Burns.. Andthis has nothing to do with "protecting" the environment, it;s all about stock grazing.  I don't hear the stockmen hollering about protecting the environment from overgrazing from cattle or sheep.....

*I vote with my Senator and support his stand on unowned, feral horses.
 
His bill makes no sense at all. The release of these horses and relaxation of BLM standards are going to only
mean misery and eventual slaughter of these horses.  You simply cannot adopt out these horses  with no controls,  below meat market price and not expect the killer buyers to take them. If that is the outcome,makes more sense for the goverment to dirive them directly to slaughter themselves and pocket the $.  Might as well just overturn the whole Wild Horse and Burro Act.  However, this is the path the current administration is taking on any conservation or enviromnental issues.....
 
Ed, you are totally entitled to your opinions, just don't try to disguise them as facts....
Karen
 

Replies
[RC] If you are concerned about America's wild horses an..., Pam Salem
Re: [RC] If you are concerned about America's wild horses an..., Sisu West Ranch