Endurance.Net Ridecamp Archives

Tom writes:

 

> "The recent SW sanctioning discussion is not new,

> even tho no one has mentioned names, there is no ROC because of it."

 

The fact remains, the ROC *was* AERC sanctioned... for the originally

requested June date.  It was only after the requesting person found

out they had procrastinated too long and could not also CEI /FEI

sanctioning did they request a move to October.  The October date

requested landed square on top of another already sanctioned 100 mile

ride.  But no other date was good enough for the requesting RM.

 

What is up?  Don't people remember this?  There was a huge discussion

about it on RC.  It's all in the archives.

 

OK, here's one for you.  If *you* were the sanctioning director and a

RM requested a date that already had a sanctioned ride what would

you do?  What if it wasn't the ROC?  Would the decision be different?

 

Are there rides and ride managers out there that don't have to follow

normal AERC sanctioning rules? 

 

Kathy Myers

in Santa Fe, NM