Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

Re: [RC] [Guest] Matthew's Proposal - Heidi Smith

I hadn't yet responded to Karen's post, so will add responses both to her
post and to Jim's replies...

1.  The "IN TIMERS"  MUST be competent person who have a solid idea of
what
their job is, and they MUST be in their proper place AT ALL TIMES.  I
have
seen many a ride that had NO intimer to start the 30 minute window
timing
process. Or had only ONE intimer who didn't realize how inportant their
job
was and went to the potty, or..etc,etc.etc.

This should happen under the CURRENT recovery time.

3.  ALL THE CLOCKS & WATCHES will have to be synchronized much more
exactly
than most of rides I  have seen in the past. I have seen some rides
where
watches/clocks were as much as 6 minutes different.

Large face clocks are common...and cheap. SE rides have one sitting at
the start point of the ride that everyone uses as the "official" time.
All you gotta do is sync your watch with it when you give your number to
the start timer. Piece of cake....

4.  There will have to be an abundance of P/R persons so that a horse
which
has met the criteria inside the 15 minutes doesn't get penalized and
sent
out of the 15 minute window to the 15+ -30 minutes window because they
had
to wait for a P/R person.

A ride that has this problem needs to change the P/R routine.

ALL THREE of the above issues SHOULD ALREADY BE routine!  If they are not,
there is something wrong!  Admittedly, the 30-minute recovery window is
currently one of the most abused concepts at rides in some areas due
precisely to poor management (lack of accurate in-times)--and that is a hole
that needs to be plugged anyway.  Perhaps THIS rule would also be better
enforced if the new proposal became a reality.

5.  Since horses have to be presented UNSADDLED for the mid-day stops,
this
15 min window would prevent a rider from going to his/her trailer to lay
down their saddle in a safe and clean place. A marginal horse is always
advised to have the saddle removed so that the recovery can occur.

Huh?  Having just gotten back into the riding routine this summer, I didn't
ever find it a problem to find a spot to shuck my saddle promptly, if I felt
I needed to.  Most times my horse is down without doing that, so I don't
always--but did practice that this summer when we had 100+ temps for several
weeks.  I would submit that if the removal of a saddle presses one in the 15
minute window, the horse is likely on the edge anyway.  Another poster (was
it Terre?) mentioned that at some shorter checks, we feed, water, eat,
readjust everything, and accomplish the entire check in just 15 minutes.

6.  All of the extra volunteers you have just required cause an extra
food
or whatever thankyou burden for the ride manager.

I don't think we would need any in the SE...just business as usual.

I agree, Jim--at least it SHOULD be business as usual.

7. What happens when a ride doesn't have alot of entries?

Well, for one, it eliminates all of your other complaints about ride
management being swamped at the vet checks trying to deal with this
concept...  (tic)

Heidi


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp

Ride Long and Ride Safe!!

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


Replies
[RC] [Guest] Matthew's Proposal, Ridecamp Moderator
Re: [RC] [Guest] Matthew's Proposal, Jim Holland