Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

Re: [RC] Adios/Metabolic failures@ PAC - Heidi Smith


If you take two simple concepts - "fit to continue" and the AERC drug
rule which bands
"any invasive procedure" and IV's are invasive as is a stomach tube -
this says to me that if a horse has to have IV's after the ride he is
not fit to continue. If you must say he's got his completion now "lets
go hook him up," they are "not fit to continue."

Certainly the horse MUST pass the final vet check in order to get
completion.  But there does have to be a point where the completion is
awarded, and if something manifests after that, it no longer affects the
completion.  AERC rules define that point as being the time when the horse
passes the veterinary exam.  (And further, the veterinary exam has to be
passed within one hour of crossing the finish line.)

If we don't have an end  point defined, one could argue that the horse that
crashes the next day was not "fit to continue"--or the next week, or
whatever.

So although the end point as defined is not perhaps perfect, there still has
to be a time where we say OK, this horse has passed, and from here on out,
what happens is not a part of the ride.

So--if the horse has passed, and the rider thinks he wants a "faster
recovery"--I personally think that is not in the best interests of the
horse, but that's within the rider's perogative.  He's no longer under the
control of the ride.  And secondly, if something manifests after that time,
it is too late to go back and pull the horse's completion.

If you think we need a later end-point for completion, Truman, float it past
the rules committee and the vet committee.  While the current one isn't
perfect, IMO it is the best we're going to do.  Even if we say that the
horse can't be medicated within an hour, there are too many good reasons why
that won't work--the horse that has passed his check and then hangs a leg
over the rope back at the trailer, etc.  I think the rule we have comes as
close to the intent as we can come while being fair to all.

And if you check, most of those horses on jugs didn't get completions
anyway.  While I don't want to demean the importance of checking into why
horses get to the point that they need to be treated, I think you're making
a mountain out of a molehill in worrying about the odd one that gets
completion and ends up on a jug later.  They already ARE "few and far
between," as you say they should be.

Heidi


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp

Ride Long and Ride Safe!!

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


Replies
[RC] Adios/Metabolic failures@ PAC, Patti Kuvik
Re: [RC] Adios/Metabolic failures@ PAC, Truman Prevatt