 |
Re: [RC] Horse Welfare - Maggie MieskeI would also highly recommend her series of articles that appeared in Endurance News that I think are/were called "Avoiding the Metabolic Pull"....best stuff (besides the Condition Scoring article) I've ever read and I must say following her recommendations has helped me immensely! I have never had a metabolic pull (knock on wood) and I think it is in part due to the "routine" suggested in those articles for hydrating the horse long before the ride ever starts! Read it and try it...you won't be sorry! Miles of smiles, Maggie http://arabianquest.com/samaha_arabians.htm "So many of our dreams seem impossible, then improbable, then inevitable." Christopher Reeve ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Noll" <tomnoll@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <ridecamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 4:41 PM Subject: [RC] Horse Welfare Greetings: The recent discussions regarding horse deaths, colic, and metabolic problems are enough to scare anyone. I am relatively new to endurance riding, but I think I can emphasize one insight that seems particularly important. My recommendation is to read, or reread, Susan Garlinghouse's web pages regarding condition score (CS): http://www.shady-acres.com/susan/tevis95-96.shtml http://www.shady-acres.com/susan/tevis98.shtml http://www.shady-acres.com/susan/conditionscore.shtml The statistical summaries are very revealing. For those who lack the time to read the documents, the conclusion is to get the condition score of the horse to 5.0 or slightly above - meaning that, at the least, there should be but are easily felt"). The studies were done at the Tevis Cup ride in 1995 and 1996, and confirmed in 1998. Even though the CS goes up to 9, there were no horses with a CS over 5.5 in the studies. It seems that it is very difficult to maintain a CS much over 5.0 on a horse that is being properly trained for endurance. Horses with a CS around 5 had fewer problems than the thinner horses and were far less likely to be pulled. The process protecting the horses could be the body reserves measured by the fat layer, or perhaps the fat layer signals that the horses were not over-trained. Either way, the statistical results are conclusive -- thin horses had a greater likelihood of metabolic problems and a greater likelihood of being pulled. The conclusion that fatness is as important as fitness may not be new, but I have not seen it mentioned in the discussions regarding horse deaths, metabolic problems, electrolytes, and colic. Based on my reading of the studies, as many as 25 percent of the horses starting Tevis may have a CS lower than 4, and a CS under 4 appears to lower the likelihood of finishing to about 25 percent or less. A CS of 5 or above improves the likelihood of finishing to over 90 percent. A proper CS will probably not protect against all sorts of calamities including over-riding a horse during a ride, but the statistical results are clear. A proper CS coupled with reasonable training may be the first step to showing up to a ride prepared -- fatness plus fitness. The right CS will not guarantee a sound horse, but it does appear to significantly improve the odds. Best Regards, Tom Noll SW Idaho =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net. Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp Ride Long and Ride Safe!! =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net. Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp Ride Long and Ride Safe!! =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|