 |
RE: [RC] Horse Welfare - McGann, BarbTom, I think you are right on. In all the discussions of overriding, weather, conditions, not caring, etc, we tend to lose sight of this factor. Its been our (Elene's, Dot's and mine) observation that many of the "great" horses in this sport run right on the ragged edge of too skinny. You see them at rides and think that they're somehow the way they should be since they're winning, but the truth is that they are just plain right on the edge and any slight change can then send them over! Thanks for reminding us. Barb McGann #840 also in sw idaho -----Original Message----- From: ridecamp-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ridecamp-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Tom Noll Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 2:42 PM To: ridecamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [RC] Horse Welfare Greetings: The recent discussions regarding horse deaths, colic, and metabolic problems are enough to scare anyone. I am relatively new to endurance riding, but I think I can emphasize one insight that seems particularly important. My recommendation is to read, or reread, Susan Garlinghouse's web pages regarding condition score (CS): http://www.shady-acres.com/susan/tevis95-96.shtml http://www.shady-acres.com/susan/tevis98.shtml http://www.shady-acres.com/susan/conditionscore.shtml The statistical summaries are very revealing. For those who lack the time to read the documents, the conclusion is to get the condition score of the horse to 5.0 or slightly above - meaning that, at the least, there should be a thin but real layer of fat over the horse's ribs ("ribs cannot be seen but are easily felt"). The studies were done at the Tevis Cup ride in 1995 and 1996, and confirmed in 1998. Even though the CS goes up to 9, there were no horses with a CS over 5.5 in the studies. It seems that it is very difficult to maintain a CS much over 5.0 on a horse that is being properly trained for endurance. Horses with a CS around 5 had fewer problems than the thinner horses and were far less likely to be pulled. The process protecting the horses could be the body reserves measured by the fat layer, or perhaps the fat layer signals that the horses were not over-trained. Either way, the statistical results are conclusive -- thin horses had a greater likelihood of metabolic problems and a greater likelihood of being pulled. The conclusion that fatness is as important as fitness may not be new, but I have not seen it mentioned in the discussions regarding horse deaths, metabolic problems, electrolytes, and colic. Based on my reading of the studies, as many as 25 percent of the horses starting Tevis may have a CS lower than 4, and a CS under 4 appears to lower the likelihood of finishing to about 25 percent or less. A CS of 5 or above improves the likelihood of finishing to over 90 percent. A proper CS will probably not protect against all sorts of calamities including over-riding a horse during a ride, but the statistical results are clear. A proper CS coupled with reasonable training may be the first step to showing up to a ride prepared -- fatness plus fitness. The right CS will not guarantee a sound horse, but it does appear to significantly improve the odds. Best Regards, Tom Noll SW Idaho =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net. Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp Ride Long and Ride Safe!! =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net. Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp Ride Long and Ride Safe!! =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
|