Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

Re: [RC] Ride time v. Elapsed Time - Truman Prevatt

It would also be an interesting numbers to look at, however, they are not in the DB. Along with the amount of hold time the distribution of the hold time would be of interest, e.g. 3 40 minute holds in a 50 compared to two one hour holds, etc. The interesting thing is that there are fields in the DB for hold times, number of checks, etc. but they are all blank. In general this information is not supplied by the RM's. It would be very useful to have such data and would go a long way in putting together a better picture.

SERA is collecting this information on our rides and hopefully in the future we can see what the correlations are with ride time - at least for SE rides. I suspect, however, that the speed on trail will turn out to be the deciding factor in most cases - which is what ride time defines. As far as amount and distribution of hold time, I suspect that this will be more correlated with pulls than speeds.  But we won't know until we have the data.

Truman

k s swigart wrote:
Truman said:

  
The ride times are what is listed in the AERC results not competition
    
times.

  
Most 25's have a 20 to 40 minute hold time which gives 5:20 to 5:30 of
    
ride time
  
available to finish a ride. My mare could (and has ) walked that.
    

This is, in fact, probably one of the problems with your analysis.  You are
doing the calculations based on "ride time" rather than total elapsed time.
Only an idiot would think that time spent resting in the middle of an effort
should not be included in any calculations of average speed.

  

Replies
[RC] Ride time v. Elapsed Time, k s swigart