Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

Re: [RC] New Endurance Horse Electrolyte Research - Linda Marins


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Susan E. Garlinghouse, DVM" <suendavid@xxxxxxx>

...
Also notice that the pool of horses in each treatment or control group is 
quite small, an 
unavoidable consequence of limited research funds.  But that also makes 
conclusions of 
performance results more difficult to assess, especially since in neither 
trial were the riders 
trying to be especially competitive, nor were the two exercise bouts 
particularly similar (ie, 
they were still during endurance rides, not repeatable and standardized 
exercise trials on a 
high-speed treadmill, for example).  When I've done field research in 
endurance horses, it can 
take HUNDREDS of participating horses to even begin to overcome the vast 
number of 
variables and before a statistically significant trend emerges.  That's just 
the math of it.
...
FWIW, I'm going to be trying to summarize a lot of the newer electrolyte 
research at one or 
both of my seminars at convention (and there's a lot of new stuff out there...

Apropos Susan and Truman's comments on the limited scope of this
research, also notice that this paper was published in a
*conference proceedings*, not in a peer-reviewed journal.  It was
published in the AAEP proceedings, not the Journal of the AAEP.

The threshold for acceptance of a research paper is far lower for
conference proceedings than for peer-reviewed journals.  It is
usually nothing more than a panel chairman with seats he has to fill
looking for anything that looks reasonable and interesting.

People looking for tenure always want to publish in a peer-reviewed
journal as their first choice  because it gets them more brownie
points with the faculty review committee.  A researcher will
settle for a conference proceeding if a) results are preliminary;
b) they need to publish *fast* and it is the next available thing;
c) they know the research isn't up to journal snuff; or d) because
the paper has already been rejected by the journal.

Linda Marins




=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp

Ride Long and Ride Safe!!

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=