Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

Re: [RC] Completion rate by Wt division - Truman Prevatt

While these "numbers look close" there is a significant statistical difference between HW and the other weight divisions. One might suspect this since the difference between MW and HW (2.4%) is 8 times greater than that between the other categories (.3%).

The Strong Law of Large Numbers is a wonderful property - it allows one to make mathematically valid decisions from statistics that appear "close" when the sample sizes become large which is the case here. When you calculate the standard errors for the four categories and then compare the number of "sigmas" apart the completion probabilities you find for the three categories, FW, LW and MW the maximum simgage (FW to MW) is 1.2 which is well within expected statistical variation at random. However, when you compare the simage of HW to MW it is on the order of 4.5 sigma - which equates to a probability of less than .001 for the sample mean for HW actually coming from the MW category.

These data show to a confidence of greater than 99% that the pull rate for the population of horses carrying heavyweight riders is higher than that for any other weight division. These data also show that the difference between the pull rates between MW, FW and LW are statistically insignificant based on these sample sizes. In order to see if the statistics of the pull are statistically different for MW, LW and FW - more data would be needed. To conclude to a 99% confidence that say the pull rate of FW was greater (or less) than a sample size of over 116000 for each would be required.

Truman

Michael Maul wrote:
There was a recent post - either on the member's forum or RC - that commented on the completion rate
by wt. division at the NC.


It showed some differences by wt division so I decided to see if that was true for a whole season's
rides.


In 2006

Div     starts  completions     % Comp
FW      4720    4104    86.9%
LW      6558    5677    86.6%
MW      4747    4096    86.3%
HW      3087    2589    83.9%
Jr      815     715     87.7%



There's a slight drop in completion rate for HW and a slight increase for Juniors but
overall - it looks pretty close. The average that year for all riders was


Mike
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net. Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp Ride Long and Ride Safe!! =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


--

"The trouble with fighting for human freedom is that one spends most of one's time defending scoundrels. For it is against scoundrels that oppressive laws are first aimed, and oppression must be stopped at the beginning if it is to be stopped at all." H. L. Mencken


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp

Ride Long and Ride Safe!!

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


Replies
[RC] Completion rate by Wt division, Michael Maul