Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

RE: [RC] Barefoot distance - Ranelle Rubin

Kathy,

You are right on for the most part..except...if the horse is lame bi-laterally...it is difficult to tell!



Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway. ~ John Wayne

Ranelle Rubin, Business Consultant
http://www.rrubinconsulting.com
Independent Dynamite Distributor
raneller@xxxxxxx

530-885-3510 home office
916-718-2427 cellular
916-848-3662 fax




From: sherman@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: ridecamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [RC] Barefoot distance
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 10:54:00 -0700

I know they have a right to make a rule about bare hooves, but I don’t understand the need for it any more than the need to require padding. Does any ride “require” padding? Some rides are particulary rocky and there are always horses pulled for lamness due to the rocky terrain, but the pads are recommended, sometimes strongly, but not required. I suspect it’s a desire to protect the horse from discomfort, but some bits are pretty darn uncomfortable, saddles cause pain, etc., and the horses are just pulled if they are determined to be suffering in any way. If the barefoot horse is ouchie, it’ll get pulled, right? Then the owner would know they need hoof protection, just like the owner using a poor fitting saddle will know it’s time to get a different saddle if their horse is pulled due to a saddle sore or sore back. It puts the responsibility onto the owner where it should be, IMO.

 

Kathy


Replies
[RC] Barefoot distance, sherman