Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

Re: [RC] Pull codes - Kristen Fisher [Remote]

I believe the vets would require, as would most RMs in the CT region, that the horse be evaluated by the vet to see if it were eligible for a RO code of any sort. Time and distance had passed since the horse was judged FTC.
 
Really the Rider Option is just that - it is a option for the rider to choose. However, if the horse is not fit to continue, they do not have this option.
 
Kristen
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 9:43 AM
Subject: Re: [RC] Pull codes

Here is a scenario of a RO-M and you can apply it to RO-L:  Horse is vetted through a VC and rider goes out on the trail.  Rider realizes the horse isn't acting just right...very subtle, but rider knows the horse intimately and realizes there is something indefinably wrong.  Rider returns to the VC (after riding a few miles out) and pulls.  This is RO-M.  In order for the code to be either RO-L, RO-M or RO-SF, the horse must have passed the VC first.  If the rider realizes something isn't right, he or she goes back to the vet and says something isn't right and pulls voluntarily, that is RO-L, RO-M or RO-SF. 

Replies
[RC] Pull codes, Michael Maul
Re: [RC] Pull codes, John Teeter
RE: [RC] Pull codes, Katrina Mosshammer
Re: [RC] Pull codes, Lynn Kinsky
Re: [RC] Pull codes, Barbara McCrary