Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

Re: [RC] LD - marshall Bates

Well stated Bruce!!


--- On Fri, 7/4/08, Bruce Weary <bweary@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Bruce Weary <bweary@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [RC] LD
To: ridecamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Friday, July 4, 2008, 4:52 PM

Kathy has said it better than I could. But I'll try, anyway.
   All right, here's the deal.   In all of the discussions I have seen 
and heard regarding LD riders feeling mistreated and "looked down
I have yet to see one instance where the perceived insult didn't extend, 
not from how they are actually spoken to and dealt with at a ride, but 
rather as a result of that rider being miffed in some way about the 
level of awards and recognition they could or could not garner for 
having ridden an LD vs. an endurance ride of 50 miles or more. Kathy 
mentioned that recognition and "spotlighting" her is not important to

her, and I believe that is congruent with her being comfortable with the 
status of LD as it was originally intended--an entry level, less 
strenuous way of exposing one's self to the sport, a place to condition 
young horses, re-condition older horses or rehab injured ones, as well 
as a venue for those who no longer prefer the longer distances for 
whatever reason: aging joints, limited time, limited resources, or 
  Those who want "more for less," and by that I mean wanting more 
opportunities for winning, BC's, points, recognition,  their name in 
lights, bragging rights at the water cooler at work, etc., for only 
having only gone half  to one fourth (or less) the distance of what our 
sport has defined as an endurance ride, are going to have to realize 
that in life, recognition and praise are generally in proportion to the 
effort given.  The same is true in our sport. It's also true whether you 
have limited resources, PTA meetings, bad knees or you work weekends. 
Our personal challenges that make it difficult to participate or succeed 
in endurance riding are not good reasons for "dumbing down" the
so that awards and praise can be more easily obtained with less effort. 
I, for one, object to such an idea.  If this seems unfair, I suggest you 
run a 10k at a long distance running event, and  then demand a "marathon 
runner" medallion at the finish line. Tell me what they say. When they 
refuse, tell them you are a runner, just the same, and you feel insulted 
and looked down upon. Tell me what they say.
   Try climbing Pike's Peak, and afterwards demanding membership into 
the Mt. Everest Club. Tell me what they say. Good luck with that one. Do 
half the work of your co-workers and demand the same pay. (Okay, I know 
there are already people getting away with that one. Bad example):>
  The point here, folks, is that our tiny little group of some 7,000 
members are a rare and fortunate breed. We have the titanic privilege of 
climbing aboard our mounts and, with the tap of our heel, or a gentle 
"get up!,"  feeling the loyal muscle and heart beneath us, convey us 
anywhere we like, for up to 100 miles at a time. Just because we ask.
  So the next time you mount up and enter a long distance riding event, 
ask yourself, "What am I really here for? Personal recognition and  
glory that is really earned 95% by my horse, or the chance to see some 
pretty country with like minded riders, and the spice of a little 
competition thrown in?"
  I know how I would answer that one, and how many of you would, too.   
Bruce Weary


 Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
 Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp

 Ride Long and Ride Safe!!


[RC] LD, Bruce Weary