Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

Re: [RC] Bad news for heavy riders and narrow horses - Truman Prevatt

It is very interesting to see this 20% number. Back when I first started the sport - this was the rule of thumb I was given by several veteran riders at the time. This was a number one of the more experienced vets at the time used as a rule of thumb. A lot of times in science a rule of thumb actually turns out to be fairly accurate. It all depends on whose thumb the rule is based on. If Richard Feynman threw out a "rule of thumb" in physics 99 chances out of a 100 it will turn out to be validated. On the other and if Alfred E. Newman threw out a rule of thumb... ;-)

The one thing I have noticed many times about treeless saddles is they don't have a tree.... well duh. They don't have a tree so they can swing around under the horse easier - especially horses with nice withers - than a well fitting saddle with a tree. I've seen that happen several time over the years and that was brought home again this weekend at a ride when not one but two horses went bucking through camp with a treeless saddle attached to his belly. If I used a treeless, I'd sure use a breast collar to keep it from going under.

Truman

Beverley H. Kane, MD wrote:
As we have been discussing on TreelessSaddles, it is extremely difficult to do legitimate, scientific studies of this kind. There are too many variables: type of horses, type of riders, type of riding, type of saddle. Plus, it’s not accurate to evaluate a report of a study without reading the original methodology in the original paper.

I was not immediately able to find Dr. Powell’s paper—maybe one of the vets on the list knows how to use a horsey Pub Med, but I would want to read the original for what kind of horses were used, how many subjects, riding level of the riders, etc.

Common sense says that any horse who carries too much weight will be sore. But the data can not be automatically extrapolated to any given heavyweight rider with a large horse, well-fitting tack, and advanced riding skills.

B


On 3/2/08 7:04 PM, "Merri" <mer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


    Horsetalk.co.nz - Full Article
    <http://www.horsetalk.co.nz/news/2008/03/011.shtml>

March 3, 2008

    Researchers in the US have bad news for overweight horse riders. A
    study has found that horses who have to carry between 25 and 30
    per cent of their bodyweight have more physical problems related
    to exercise than those who carry 20 percent or less.

    Horses carrying 30% body weight showed a significant increase in
    muscle soreness and muscle tightness scores. The changes were less
    marked when they carried 25% body weight.

More... <http://www.horsetalk.co.nz/news/2008/03/011.shtml>

    --
    Posted By Merri to Consider This
    
<http://www.endurance.net/channels/2008/03/bad-news-for-heavy-riders-and-narrow.html>
    at 3/02/2008 08:03:00 PM



_______________
Beverley Kane, MD
Horsensei Equine-Assisted Learning & Therapy
Woodside, CA
650-868-3379
http://www.horsensei.com

*The Manual of Medicine and Horsemanship--
Transforming the Doctor-Patient Relationship with Equine-Assisted Learning
**http://www.authorhouse.com/bookstore/ItemDetail.aspx?bookid=49669*


--

"It is even harder for the average ape to believe that he has descended from man." H.L. Mencken


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp

Ride Long and Ride Safe!!

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


Replies
Re: [RC] Bad news for heavy riders and narrow horses, Beverley H. Kane, MD