Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

Re: [RC] [RC] Weight Divisions/Voting - frank solano - Lynne Glazer

I would love to see the weight divisions reduced to 3 and a chunk of the budget for those awards redirected to recognition for longer distance rides: 100s.

Lynne
#14580

On Feb 14, 2007, at 10:18 AM, FXLivestock@xxxxxxx wrote:

Frank,
?? I agree with you.? I would like to see how the general membership feels about weight divisions. Personally, weight divisions mean nothing to me so it doesn't matter if there are 4 or?0.?I ride as a featherwt but could easily make the middle wt divison.???Wt divisions just?don't figure into my goals for endurance.?
?
But, I think looking at how the membership feels about the number of weight divisions will say a lot about how AERC members feel about recognition programs and awards.?The information gained as?by product of a vote may really help in the future when?considering new recognition and award programs.
?
? ??Really,?the only purpose of having weight divisions is recognition, whether it is at the individual ride or whether it is accumulating points for year end recognition.? The ride itself will not change?if there?are no weight divisions or four weight divisions.? Overall placing will not change so it really doesn't effect those that "race".? It also doesn't effect those that have life time achieivement goals.??If you are not riding for points or for individual ride division recognition, weight divisions really don't matter.
?
? It all comes down to how members want recognition in the sport.? If there?eventually is a vote or survey for the?entire membership, I?think it will be interesting to see the results.
?
?
Kim Fuess
AERC #6648



Replies
[RC] [RC] Weight Divisions/Voting - frank solano, FXLivestock