Being a 1 rat study, i see that my record
does NOT show the pull in Michigan at the finish (M), pull in Ohio at the
finish (L), pull at the ROC in S. Dakota (L), pull at the OD (M), pull in South
Carolina (RO) and a pull at the PAC in Arizona (M) all in 100's, that come to
mind. There are also 100's completed that aren't there.
So if this 1 rat study shows 100 % completion in
100's and i know its flawed, what good do i see in past AERC record
keeping? Not much. This was ages ago and its not important in the
entire realm of all things, but i point it out to all you who who put a lot of
stock in 'record keeping'.
If you look at my record and all you see is
completions in 100's, don't take it as gospel. In another senerio don't
judge others by what their records show unless its downright flagrantly
abusive. Aren't these the folks you're trying to label anyway? That
to me is the reason of the codes.
Also, let me go on record to say that the codes do
not need to be printed because of the stigma applied and Stigmata makes people
do silly things when, if it wasn't applied they may not try to
continue on and cause harm.
AERC has made a great stride in record keeping
in the past decade but i see no reason for these codes in data analysis, knowing
there is more to every story. ts
