Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

RE: [RC] Progress - Kristen A Fisher

Actually in CT it's 60 more often than 64, from my observations. In 2003-2004 it seemed it was never above 60. In the past couple years I've seen more 64 criteria, but 60 as much or more.
 
Kristen

From: ridecamp-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ridecamp-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Karen Standefer
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 8:54 AM
To: ridecamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: bweary@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [RC] Progress

I just attended High Roller in Texas last weekend and the pulse criteria was 64 (flat ride, cool day, but really humid).  It sounded to me that was the norm for that area of the country.

 

Karen

 

From: ridecamp-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ridecamp-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of heidi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 11:46 PM
To: rides2far@xxxxxxxx
Cc: ridecamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; bweary@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [RC] Progress

 

Any more, it makes me nervous when ride vets set pulse criteria any higher than 60 at rides--and I absolutely would not vet a ride without insisting that the criterion be 60 (or 56 in extreme situations).  I'm actually surprised to hear that it is not yet the norm in the SE.

 

Heidi

Replies
RE: [RC] Progress, Karen Standefer