Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

[RC] The Bare Facts - k s swigart

Debbie Kirchner said:

Debbie, I
don't know very many people (except in show barns) that shoe horses
until they reach that point.  

You are kidding right??? most people automatically shoe a horse
as a 2 year old, certainly by 3... the feet are not done growing
till 5 or 6, and they shoe them... yikes... 

While I have heard of some people who "automatically" shoe a horse before they 
start riding it, but I don't know any personally. I don't know of anybody who 
"automatically" shoes a horse as a 2 year old.  Most people I know try to put 
it off as long as possible and don't put shoes on the horse until either a) 
they notice that the hoof starts breaking apart or b) the horse starts to get 
foot sore, and many of them wait too long after getting to b.  

There have been enough now that I have stopped counting the number of "problem" 
horses I have fixed (e.g. horses that spin, balk, rear, refuse to go first, 
refuse to go out alone, etc.) by taking the horse for one ride, have it 
tippy-toe along, and then telling the owner that the horse has sore feet and 
needs some kind of hoof protection.  As often as not, they don't believe me.  
So I bring out a set of the many protective boots I have and it takes about 1 
½ rides for the horse to figure out that it no longer has to worry about 
stepping on a rock and moves forward willingly.  I am not contending that 
providing hoof protection is the solution to all horse training problems; 
however, I have found that it is a solution to quite a few of them.

It never ceases to amaze me the number of people who ride barefoot horses who 
don't know how to tell when their horse has sore feet.  The problem is, horses 
that are foot sore don't limp (assuming all the feet are sore), so their owners 
think that just because their horses' feet don't have chipped hoof walls that 
there can't be anything wrong with the feet.  However, it is AFTER the hoof has 
worn down to the point where there isn't any excess hoof wall left to chip that 
hoof wear has outpaced hoof growth and the horse no longer has enough foot to 
go barefoot.  My horse's feet don't chip is a poor indicator as to whether the 
horse has enough foot to remain comfortable barefoot.

There ARE some horses with good enough feet and are used sparingly enough or on 
forgiving enough terrain for the amount of foot that they have, that hoof wear 
never does outpace hoof growth.  These horses can, indeed, spend their entire 
lives barefoot.

However, as soon as hoof wear outpaces hoof growth, they need some kind of hoof 
protection to remain comfortable, and it is cruel not to provide it.

There are several alternatives to steel shoes for providing this protection 
(and there is getting to be more and more) and all of them have advantages and 
disadvantages which vary depending on, among other things, the horse, the 
owner, and where you live (since not all of the alternatives are equally 
available in all locations).

Personally, I have seen way more barefoot horses that would benefit from some 
kind of hoof protection than I have seen shod horses that don't need it.  And 
most of the barefoot ones that I have seen that would benefit from shoes have 
been barefoot their whole lives so the "their feet just need to adapt to going 
barefoot" argument just doesn't hold water.

kat
Orange County, Calif.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp

Ride Long and Ride Safe!!

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-