Geez, not meaning to steps on
toes, but, ... am I the only that thinks some people 'got their
shorts in a bunch' over what really amounts to nothing ? Ok, 'ad
agent', "rep" - explained "The Ad" was satirical - figured that
at first reading. At first yes, I too thought was really rather stupid on
thier part - the ad people., to possibly PO buyers. However, The
only things I considered when buying a truck are - purpose intended, vehicle
stats - horsepower, torque/rpms, ground clearance, options, and price.
How well it will serve my purpose, either towing or snow. And
availability of conveinent/competent service. Granted if saleperson treated me
like some have discussed, I too would have 'walked' to another dealer - but
probably same 'brand' - if that is what I decided suited my needs.
But, I still prefer my GMC. To other brands. ( but to each his/her
own ) .And speaking of ads, thought thiers ( GMC) was one of the
best years ago, when it told of a 'big man' - 6'4", 300#, or a small
woman - 4'10", both being comfortable in their trucks, with seat belt, seat
adjustments, etc. And, stats.JMHO.
Now on topic, appreciated comments from B
Kane, re- Parelli methods - yesterday, ...interesting; especially since have one
horse I am starting - sometime soon, when weather decent ( I hate mud, do
not have a ring, or round pen, so.. ). All ( 3 ) previous
horses came 'broke', ok with 'issues', but kinda knew basics, lol,
kinda 'green', and already had 'habits' to deal with. This may be fun.
Hopefully, can 'start' and not ruin one.
And anyone who has not gone to
site about trails access
