RE: [RC] steves' remark seeing Paladin on the trail again - heidiStart what? Angie, how about not taking my post out of context? I simply made a statement and asked for details. Please read the last two sentences. "Why was it "terrible"? It's what happens when you put "win" above "horse welfare". It ain't pretty. However, how about some "facts"? Would like to see some details and input from people who were "there". Not a thing wrong with the last two sentences, Jim, although we had one very factual report from Kim, and another very interesting first-hand account from Steve regarding the changes made in the management of the horses. So while we sure don't have ALL the facts, we do have some. The problem with your post was the second sentence. That was not "simply making a statement"--that was twisting what happened, was "taking out of context" what this particular horse was asked to do, and was downright judgmental and inflamatory. It certainly was not consistent with a query for the facts, as you have already clearly prejudged what happened and have made a conclusion about what Bev did, accusing her pretty much of intentionally putting her horse in jeopardy. I'm not Angie, but I'd suspect that was the sentence to which she was referring when she asked you to get off your soapbox. I know I certainly thought "soapbox" when I read it as well. Heidi =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net. Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp Ride Long and Ride Safe!! =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|