Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

Re: [RC] Endurance Vs. CRT - heidi

The only thing I'd add (and I
have  LOT of CTR miles) is that endurance CAN be a
race. It doesn't have to be. It's called a race
because at endurance distances, you are placed
accordingt to when y ou cross the finish line, but
that doesn't mean you have to race.

Many CTR riders have the mistaken idea that you HAVE
to race and run  your horse to do endurance. The truth
is endurance actually gives you more options than CTR.
If you want to ride doop de doo down the trail and
just get a completion, you can do that. If you want to
race you can do that. And most people ride somewhere
in between.

And to add to that, the CTR time "window" is usually actually about
mid-pack or just a bit slower compared to endurance speeds.  Although the
front runners at endurance rides may well be racing, as Chris says above,
the riders who take the maximum time can actually go SLOWER than most CTRs
are run.

Another comment on the holds--the philosophical difference between the two
is that endurance wants to see the pulse drop to point X (usually 60 bpm
or thereabouts) before the horse proceeds.  To that end, the clock is
still running at the vet check until that pulse is reached (may be there
or below as soon as the horse comes in, but horse is allowed up to half an
hour to meet that criterion).  As others have mentioned, the hold time (if
there is one) does not start until the pulse criterion is met.  The CTR
philosophy is to score the horse according to how quickly he drops, and to
that end, the pulse is taken at precisely 10 minutes after arrival.  The
horse loses points based upon how far above an "ideal" pulse he still is
at 10 minutes--depending on the rule system, that "ideal" is generally
somewhere in the range of 40 to 48 bpm.  That said--there is also a
"stop-gap" in most CTR rule systems where a horse that does not meet a
"safe" parameter (similar to endurance--usually 60-64 bpm) in that time
frame, he is penalized and rechecked in another period of time, and if he
fails to meet that at some point, he is not allowed to continue, just like
in endurance.  As for hold times--they are variable in both sports. 
Others have already stated that the hold time in endurance does not begin
until the pulse is down, whereas in CTR, the 10-minute check-back is
usually a part of your hold time.  But in both cases, there are rides
where the hold time may be as much as an hour, or anything in between. 
(In endurance, stops where the horse can go as soon as the pulse is down
are called "stop and go" checks; in CTR, stops where one proceeds as soon
as the 10-minute pulse is taken are simply pulse stops.)

For a beginner rider, the scoring aspect of CTR is a great learning
experience, as is the narrow time window, which teaches you how to
estimate your speed accurately and pace your horse accordingly.  For many
riders, this system remains their preferred method of competition.  For
others (of which I am admittedly one), once they have mastered the pacing
and have learned how to evaluate their horses via aspects of the scoring
system, the freedom of endurance is more appealing.  You CAN learn the
same things starting out in endurance, but it is spelled out for you much
better in CTR.  So that might influence the original poster's choice as
well.

Heidi



=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp

Ride Long and Ride Safe!!

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


Replies
Re: [RC] Endurance Vs. CRT, Truman Prevatt
Re: [RC] Endurance Vs. CRT, Chris Paus