Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

Re: [RC] re:reply to Bob Morris - heidi

Please Reply to: Frances gumbootballet@xxxxxxx or ridecamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
========================================Would something like this added
to the rules help? : No horse will be ridden while under the influence
of any substance other than feed, vitamin/minerals and electrolytes. No
drugs, medicines,supplements, herbal remedies, or homeopathic substances
shall be administered to any horse during competition or  for 72 hours
prior to competition. I think that clears up the grey area in the
current ruling quite nicely.

Well, actually, no, it doesn't.  Your first sentence is fine.  But your
second sentence carries the implication that it is ok to give pretty much
ANYTHING prior to the 72-hour cut-off.  That just isn't the case. 
Substances with long half-lives may still be very much present in the
horse's system in that time frame.  And that's why AERC has wisely avoided
naming cut-off times, or levels, or any such numbers.  The presence of
such substances still violates the intent of the rule, and giving an
arbitrary cut-off time simply muddies the waters.

I think the reason that people are unsettled about this rule is that it
requires people to actually THINK about what they put into their horse and
what the implications might be--and WHY they put those things into the
horse in the first place.  Example--my horse is sick, but I put him on an
antibiotic, and I make sure that he is off of it 72 hours before the XYZ
ride so that under your proposal he is "legal."  He may seem "ok" so I'm
happy about this concrete guideline.

But the present rule makes one look a bit deeper--gee, maybe this horse
will still have this drug in his system--I don't really know.  Well, maybe
he really hasn't had time to get over the aftermath of being ill.  Well,
gee, am I trying to take him to the XYZ for his good or for mine?  Gosh,
if there is a chance I might jeopardize his recovery, maybe I had better
wait for the ABC ride a month from now!  THAT, folks, is the intent--and
the beauty--of Rule 13.  Instead of inviting people to get as close as
possible to some defined "edge" it invites them to think instead about
what is best for their horse!

Do all folks understand that about Rule 13?  Apparently not.  Nor will
they, no matter how often it is explained.  But that is still the heart of
the sport--taking care of the horse!--and even if just MOST folks try
their best to follow the intent of the rule, it benefits horses.

Heidi



=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp

Ride Long and Ride Safe!!

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


Replies
[RC] re:reply to Bob Morris, Ridecamp Guest