Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

Re: [RC] To breed a 'no name' horse - heidi

Far too many horses of all ages being bred today are being bred
because they have a "famous name" in the pedigree--one where the fame
has been bought by a well-padded training, showing, and advertising
budget, not by any particular merit.  Unfortunately, that sort of fame
is not genetic, and is not passed on to foals...Heidi>>

Change of subject, if I may .........  Let's say you have a good
stallion, conformationally, temperament etc., although he has cosmetic
imperfections and therefore he doesn't go to shows or doesn't have a
"big name" pedigree.  However, he breeds good foals from various mares.
How would you market him as a breeding prospect?  (He has to pay back
all that hay he eats, ya know ;-)) )  Just a "slightly" hypothetical
question ;-))

It depends on what you mean by "no name."  By show ring standards, the
best endurance horses are by and large "no name."  But to those familiar
with pedigrees, they read like royalty.

One place where people get confused is that in a breed like TBs, a "name"
comes about because of either performance of exactly what the breed is
bred for, or production of horses with such performance.  There is no "big
name" any other way.  In the Arabian world, "big name" comes about due to
hype and advertising budget--things that are NOT heritable!  So I set NO
store whatsoever by the "fame" of the names in Arabian pedigrees, but
rather by the qualities that the horse actually had.  So in fact, when
breeding riding horses, I tend to run far and fast AWAY from what some
people consider "big names."

First of all, it is not just "cosmetic imperfections" that keep good
Arabians out of shows.  It is also good conformation!  The Arabian show
ring is looking for a sausage with LOOOONG legs that come about frequently
due to an upright shoulder with an open angle, LOOOOONG cannons, LOOOOONG
upright pasterns, etc.  They are looking for a long scrawny neck that does
not balance with the horse unless the horse has a body as long as a
railroad car.  In the English and Park classes they are looking for a
one-geared horse with a "big" trot that is not natural to the breed (the
classic horse can "turn it on" in play, but that is not his working gear)
and that will pound a horse to death over miles, particularly if he has
the long back that goes with it and cannot round well.  So more and more
it is becoming a contradiction to equate good horses in any sort of riding
sense with show wins.

If a stallion IS well-conformed, the next thing I look at is his pedigree.
Does he have a pedigree full of individuals who by and large possess
riding traits?  If his pedigree is a mixed bag, he is apt to be a
disappointment as a sire, even if he himself is lovely, because he will
sire all over the map.  A noted equine geneticist is fond of drumming into
us that a pedigree is not a blueprint--it is a set of possibilities.  And
the way to ensure that you get the sorts of offspring that you want is to
choose pedigrees that have primarily that sort of horses in them.  If
there is everything in the pedigree but the kitchen sink, that is
precisely what you will get breeding the horse over the long haul.  Some
people say that pedigree is meaningless as a prognosticator--well, when
you have a pedigree like that, it IS worthless, but OTOH, it also
"predicts" exactly what it is--which is anything and everything.  On the
other hand, if you narrow your options by having a pedigree full of what
you actually want, it is a very good prognosticator of what you will get.

So back to marketing a "no name" stallion--first of all, EVERYTHING his
offspring can be comes from his pedigree and the mare's pedigree.  You
cannot pluck genes out of nowhere.  They are in there somewhere.  So KNOW
what is in there, even if it isn't famous.  Because that is what your set
of possibilities is.  If you can't live with Aunt Fanny back there three
generations, don't breed this horse!  But if the horses back there have
the qualities you want, fabulous!  If the stallion is a consistent sire,
odds are there are some good horses back there--even if you don't know
them.  It works both ways.  Find out about those horses, and why they are
good, and market accordingly.

Heidi


============================================================
There are 2 ways to win at this sport. You take a horse and race him for a
short time and then find a new horse or you can take one horse , do the
homework and spend many miles and years enjoying that horse.
~  Paddi Sprecher

ridecamp.net information: http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/

============================================================

Replies
Re: [RC] To breed a "no name" horse, Kristene Smuts