Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

Re: [RC] [RC] [RC] LD/Endurance - Joe Long

On Tue, 18 May 2004 11:08:46 -0400, "Howard Bramhall" <howard9732@xxxxxxx>
wrote:

It already is a sport, points or no points.  I don't see the 60 bpm as being 
the finish line really slowing down or reducing any of the ride times in the 
sport.  Make the rules the same for the LD, give them points, give them a 
finish line, and give them rider education focusing on the horse in this 
distance.

The pulse-down finish does slow down the ride, you can see it.  Few riders race
at top speed to the finish line, most slow down as the come in to try to get the
earliest recovery.  Teaching riders to do that teaches them a valuable skill for
vet checks in endurance rides.

I can absolutely guarantee that if you change LD rides to award placing by the
order of crossing the finish line, along with points for placing, you WILL see
more horses harmed and more horses DIE in LD rides.  Period.  No doubt about it
whatsoever.  It just isn't a long enough distance to allow even the strictest
veterinary control to catch over-riding, and as Catoosa so tragically
demonstrated you can kill a lot of horses in 25 miles.

-- 

Joe Long
jlong@xxxxxxxx
http://www.rnbw.com

============================================================
At the end of the day maybe the definition of endurance isn't the length of
the ride but rather the spirit in which it is ridden. 
~  Maryanne Stroud Gabani

ridecamp.net information: http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/

============================================================

Replies
Re: [RC] [RC] [RC] LD/Endurance, Howard Bramhall