RE: [RC] APF What is in it, and would residues from its administration violate rule 13? - bobmorris
Title: Message
Truman:
I
would presume that WE includes Truman Prevatt. Let us all see your improved Rule
to replace the current Rule 13!
Bob
Bob Morris Morris Endurance Enterprises Boise, ID
-----Original Message----- From:
ridecamp-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ridecamp-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Truman Prevatt Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004
8:19 PM To: Ed & Wendy Hauser Cc:
ridecamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [RC] APF What is in it, and
would residues from its administration violate rule
13?
But if you read rule 13 in says "exogenously
administered compunds even if normally found endogenously" - that is if you
don't like Se repalce it with vit E or vit C or vit B or any other normal
substance you want to consider.
The AERC drug policy was developed and
promoted by one of the visionaries in the AERC - Kerry Ridgeway. He is a
wonderful and caring person, however, like any visionary he needs other people
to fill in the details of what the policy means. That is what is missing. Why
the hell is MSM banned when a) it most likely will not test and b) clinical
trials have shown it has no pharmacological effects?
We need to
formulate a RULE base on a POLICY that verbalizes a PHILOSOPHY we all agree
on. All we have in the rules is PHILOSOPHY. Philosophy is
worthless as a rule if it can't be enforced and if it won't test it can't be
enforced.
Truman
Ed & Wendy Hauser wrote:
Your argument about Se is pure BS. Se is
a normal part of all the forage in our country. It is absolutely
required for life. Supplementing in areas where it is low is not using
a drug, anymore than supplementing carbohydrates by giving corn to a horse
is using a drug.
--
We imitate our
masters only because we are not yet masters ourselves, and only
because in doing so
we learn the truth about what cannot be imitated.
