Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

Re: [RC] RO - Annie George

RWO was meant as toung in cheek.  (as a ha ha)  Annie G.
Anne George Saddlery   www.vtc.net/~ageorge
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 5:23 PM
Subject: Re: [RC] RO

Re: last sentence....that's what RO is designed for.  Rider is ill, exhausted, injured or just plain doesn't want to continue.  I don't think it's necessary for the rider to have to explain why he/she chose an RO.  And if he/she chooses to explain, everyone else should be gracious and understanding about it.  Why do we all have to point fingers????
 
Barbara
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 5:10 PM
Subject: [RC] RO

I Think we all have some non completion on our records that is not acurate. I pulled out once because I didnt think my horse was rite, and the vets kept saying go on and ride, they thought he was fine. I asked for an RO but the record shows Pulled Lame. with no RO mentioned.   A person could get real pissed off about that!    but Oh well, we all know the records are not perfect. .... Wouldnt just ROF be good?  I always thought there should be an RWO for Rider Whimped Out. Sometimes a person just does not want to ride any farther for reasons that have nothing to do with the horse.  Annie G.                            Anne George Saddlery   www.vtc.net/~ageorge

Replies
[RC] RO, Annie George
Re: [RC] RO, Barbara McCrary