Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

[RC] Overridden and Fit to Continue - Howard Bramhall

Heidi, I've waited just about forever to say this, but, hey, "I agree with you here."  Or, maybe, I agree with Doc Newell.
 
It's one of the few things I appreciate about FEI.  No talking with the vets, no personal interaction.  And, quite frankly, it's the way it should be.  The Vet at a ride should not be your buddy, he should not be your friend.  If you have a relationship with him than you should go see one of the other ride vets.  He should be evaluating your horse, and only your horse.  Your comments, your opinions should have nothing to do with his decision.  NOTHING!
 
No caveats, no "Well, if you promise me you'll with go slow with this horse, you can go on." Bull shit.  Because, that's exactly what it it.  If in doubt, pull the horse, and, trust no human to tell you they'll comply with your demands.  It's all for the horse and if there's any uncertainty, pull the horse. The horse is either fit to continue or it is not and listening to the rider's excuses for the horse's performance during the vet check should be immaterial.  Your horse either passes or it does not.
 
I don't care who you are, even if you're my gal, Val.  No favoritism.  It's all about the horse.  The horse is the one who is fit to continue or it is not.  The human leading it down the path during the trot out is immaterial.  Only a passenger.  It's the horse's life at stake here, not the riders.
 
cya,
Howard
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 2:02 PM
Subject: Re: [RC] overridden and fit to continue

> It worries me a great deal to read that vets may base their decisions on
> what they either perceive or know to be a rider's level of experience
> instead of a professional and unbias analysis of the horse's symptoms.

Well, as Doc Newell said--that's favoritism, and is unacceptable.

That said--there are degrees of everything, and even with an unbiased and
professional analysis of the horse's "symptoms" there are judgment calls.
On the beginning edge of fatigue, there IS room for vets to advise a
different ride strategy (stay here and eat awhile, slow down, etc.) where
there is still the "safety net" of the next vet check, and where if the
rider minds the vet, they are likely to complete with a healthy horse, but
if they don't, they may well not make it past the next check.  There is a
lot of room between the horse that hasn't been anywhere yet and the one that
is over the edge--and that is why we HAVE vets at rides, instead of just
having a robotic "by-the-numbers" system.  It IS a judgment call.

Heidi