 |
RE: [RC] Ride time v. Elapsed Time - Steph TeeterOk, sorry that's the first I've heard of it, and it seems like such an obviously good idea. I'll bring it up on the Board list, get some feedback, and if there aren't any reasons not to go forward with the idea, I'll see if I can get it on one of the meeting agendas. It seems that half of life is 'timing'. Maybe the timing wasn't right in Chatanooga, but with all the recent flurry of stats being published, folks will be more receptive. Steph -----Original Message----- From: Jim Holland [mailto:lanconn@xxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 10:43 AM To: steph@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: Ridecamp Subject: Re: [RC] Ride time v. Elapsed Time Hmmmm...thought I did suggest it. I discussed it with Mike Maul and Randy Eiland at the Chattanooga Convention when I was trying to find out why data on ride statistics and horse deaths was not available for our members and number crunchers...that's where I got the information I posted....and from a few other people, like Bob Morris. No one seemed to know why it was on the sanction form....I thought it was kinda strange to put it there in the first place. How else should I "suggest" it? =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= http://www.endurance.net/ads/seabiscuit.html Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net. Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp Ride Long and Ride Safe!! =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|