 |
Re: [RC] horse fatalities, 2002 - Jim HollandHeidi Smith wrote: I don't know why people try to read so much into simple statements--the vet committee is as concerned about horse deaths as anyone (if not moreso), but they also have the burden of approaching the subject in a logical and scientific manner, and don't have the luxury of spouting off a bunch of "maybes." Why not? Speculation on what "might" have happened is the first step toward resolving the problem....as in the Challenger disaster, for example. Speculation should include propose possible scenarios not only as to why it might have happened, but how it might be prevented in the future. Are the details surrounding the death "secret" and not availble to us "regular" AERC members? This is not some big political coverup, as some folks seem to want to make it. <sigh> IMHO, based on personal experience in dealing with AERC on this issue, I respectfully disagree....at least it WAS....perhaps less so now, but the jury is still out... Jim, Sun of Dimanche+, and Mahada Magic =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net. Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp Ride Long and Ride Safe!! =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|