Re: [RC] [RC] B.C.A.A. Complex - Truman Prevatt
As technology advances, it is sometimes difficult for law to keep up.
For example it would be wonderful to be able to execute contracts on
line electrically. However, our legal system is based on a signature.
How does this translate to an "electronic signature." This question was
being discussed in the early '70's and even today, at least with the
people I do business with, all contracts require a written signature by
all parties. A fax is sufficient - if it is followed up with an original.
Since the drug rule was passed some 10 years ago, a lot has changed. At
that time your local GNC needed to be only the size of a phone booth.
Today they need to be large. The supplements companies have done a very
good job of isolating and separating individual nutrients and bring
those to market. Even some of the pharmaceutical companies are following
this trend. Instead of eating a "well balanced meals," and hoping to get
what we need - we as a society are taking nutrients "targeted" for
specific reasons. Some may work and some are probably no more effective
than a sugar pill. And to a large extent the medical community is
supporting this. How many MD tell their healthy patents an aspirin a day
is a good idea or maybe they should take about 400 IU of vit E, etc.
Similar trends are present in the equine world. The number of
supplements that you see has exploded in the past 5 years - with little
end in sight. Most of it is probably fueled by the human supplement
industry. When the drug rule was passed the number of these "nutrients"
was very small and hence there was little issue. The preamble to the
drug rule is a wonderful statement of policy. But I think as time and
tide as marched on, the environment that exist today is vastly different
than that existed 10 years ago concerning what is a food product and
what is a "drug."
I remember the (what was probably the first) case under this new rule.
It was a very well know rider who had no intention of breaking any
rules. They ended up using a homemade liniment that had DMSO in it in
the Tevis. There was a huge controversy which played out on the pages of
EN. From my recollection, lawyers were bought in and it got somewhat
nasty. All this over a liniment that probably that had absolutely no
impact on performance. Thank goodness we didn't have Ridecamp back then.
If a veteran endurance vet (who was on the AERC vet committee when he
did this) tells a person that Adaquan is not a drug but a nutrient and
they should time their Adaquan shots so they fall on the day before a
ride, what does that say about the interpretation of the rule. I've
seen that happen. We accept some things that have been around for a long
time - like Adaquan, Legend, etc., but not others that haven't. When if
fact under a strict interpretation of rule 13 none should be allowed.
What is the new rider to think? Yes, Jim, I think you are correct - the
rule needs to be looked at. It needs to be enforced and it needs to be
enforceable. Enforceability implies testability - hard evidence is
required for enforcement. These are not easy issues but in my experience
standing behind a set of simple sounding words and "wrapping yourself in
the flag" to defend them solves little.
Since there has been random testing the past several years, I believe we
have had a very small number of infractions of rule 13. That's the good
news. If we can keep the stuff that reasonable people of differing
opinions agree should not be used on an endurance ride and will show up
in a test so it is actually enforceable, then we have a very good sport
indeed.
Truman
T
Jim Holland wrote:
With regard to the "keep it simple" paranoia with regard to AERC rules,
I would like to point out that the venerable Constitution of the United
States has required numerous amendments to keep up with the times.
(Granted that the on prohibition was somewhat misguided) <grin> IMHO,
several AERC rules certainly could use some thoughtful "upgrades" to be
more specific, given the advancements in technology and medicine.
JMO....
Jim, Sun of Dimanche, and Mahada Magic.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
- Replies
-
- Re: [RC] [RC] B.C.A.A. Complex, FASTGraphic
- Re: [RC] [RC] B.C.A.A. Complex, Heidi Smith
- Re: [RC] [RC] B.C.A.A. Complex, Jim Holland
|
|