Check it Out!
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index] [Subject Index]

Re: Wilderness Designations

Hi Joe: Thanks for the reply, one of the great things about the US is that
we can all have our say. I am very active in working with developers in
Northern CA. I may of my experiences that one of the first things a
developer is exclude the PUBLIC from what used to be Public Land, one must
accept that the loss of a short section of land that contains "the/Any trail
at times means a huge dedication of time and resources to replace or
relocate any trail. This to me is unacceptable and should not be a burden on
the Public because of the sale or exchange of Public Lands. I applaud all
that have a opinion that is different from what I view. This form serves to
inform the Public as to what is/has occurred through out the US. steven

----- Original Message -----
From: Joe Long <>
To: <>
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 1999 8:54 AM
Subject: Re: Wilderness Designations

>Steven, you are engaging in the fallacy called the excluded middle.
>That is, you take a complex situation with a wide range of
>alternatives, and insist that there are only two possible scenarios.
>To wit:  Wilderness designation or loss to sale/development.
>These are not the only two options, not by a long shot.  And for
>horsemen wishing to ride, loss of a trail to a Wilderness designation
>is just as much lost as if it is sold to a developer.
>Joe Long
>     Business
>    Personal

    Check it Out!    

Home    Events    Groups    Rider Directory    Market    RideCamp    Stuff

Back to TOC