Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

[RC] Weed Free Hay/interesting article part I.5 - heidi larson


From BioCycle
Journal of Composting &Organics Recycling
July 2001, Page 25

ONE YEAR LATER
PERSISTENT HERBICIDES IN COMPOST
This analysis of the Dow chemical products that caused problems at two
Washington state composting facilities, proves that protective steps need to be
taken.
David Bezdicek, Mary Fauci, Dan Caldwell, Rick Finch and Jessie Lang
ONE YEAR has passed since the Washington State University (WSU) composting
facility and the Spokane Regional Compost Facility discovered traces of
persistent herbicides in their composts. In Spokane, the source of contamination
is a compound called clopyralid. Compost contamination at WSU initially involved
the herbicide picloram, but clopyralid has since been detected in the compost
also. In both cases, the compost damaged sensitive plants at local gardens and
nurseries. Several articles published at that time brought the issues to the
forefront (see “Dealing with Herbicide Residues in Compost,” September, 2000
BioCycle and also the references, Bezdicek, et al. 2000, and Miltner and
Stahnke, 2000). Clopyralid contamination has since been reported at a yard
trimmings facility in Cheney, Washington and at a horse facility in Whitman
County Washington. Incidents in Pennsylvania and New Zealand have also come to
light.
Today, both the WSU and Spokane facilities are still dealing with the problem of
persistent herbicides. Facility managers, regulators, public agencies,
researchers and the herbicide manufacturer continue to seek solutions to the
problem, ranging from on-site treatment to regional product bans.
THE CULPRITS – CLOPYRALID AND PICLORAM
Clopyralid is an active ingredient in several herbicide products that have a
wide variety of applications (Table 1). The most prominent product, and the one
implicated in the Spokane situation, is Confront, made by Dow AgroSciences
(Dow). Confront is used on lawns to control dandelions, clover, and other
broadleaf plants. It was introduced in 1989 to replace existing herbicides that
required multiple applications — from three to five applications per season to
one or two. Clopyralid also is registered in a number of formulations used on
cereals, grass hay, sugar beets, mint, asparagus, strawberry, blueberry and
Christmas trees. At WSU, the source of clopyralid contamination is believed to
be from grass hay and straw, purchased for its livestock operations on and off
campus. Thus clopyralid is a potential concern for composting facilities taking
yard trimmings or agricultural feedstocks.
Picloram is used to control weeds for agricultural and industrial applications
including pasture, rangeland, railroads and power lines. It is the less
worrisome of the two herbicides since treated residuals are less likely to be
collected for composting.
Clopyralid and picloram are classified as pyridine carboxylic acid herbicides
(see Figure 1). They are growth-regulator type herbicides. Like 2,4-D and
dicamba, they work by mimicking plant growth hormones called auxins. The effect
of these chemicals is to cause the plant to grow abnormally. They are quite
water soluble and mobile in soil. One advantage of these chemicals is their low
toxicity for animals, including humans.
Typical symptoms of clopyralid phytotoxicity are shown in Figure 2. Although
plants may appear normal, the loss of “apical dominance” will likely prevent
fruit set. Some leaves that are supposed to be compound become single leaves.
Side shoots may develop where they should not be. In legumes, cupping is a
typical symptom and trifoliate leaves fail to develop. The most susceptible
crops can be sensitive to clopyralid at the ppb level. Clopyralid is extremely
toxic to sunflower, legume crops and solanaceous plants, including tomatoes and
potatoes. Effects on these plants can be seen at levels of 10 parts per billion
(ppb) or less. According to Dow’s literature, this is roughly 100 times lower
than the tolerance allowed on asparagus, 50,000 times lower than the tolerance
allowed on grasses, and 300 times lower than allowed on barley grain.
Concentrations above these low levels are seldom seen in the real world, but
they point out the potential for
contaminated feedstocks to affect sensitive crops.

.      o o          o o
.    o_ \ \____   o_ \_\
.       (*)~(*)\_______/
.       /              \
.       \______/       /
.         \_______/\  /-
.     o-- /_/       \  /
.        / \       / /
.       o  o    o-- /
.                 / \
.                o   o
heidi larson




=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp

Ride Long and Ride Safe!!

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-