Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

RE: [RC] Forced to use a bit? - Terry Banister

                Well....one of the purposes of a dressage test is to determine whether the rider has successfully trained the horse to accept the bit.  A bit difficult to determine this if there is no bit to accept
 
Well, there are a ton of other Horse Show events besides "Dressage,"but then these Federations mentioned in the article must not even know why they are doing what they are doing:
 
The Royal Dutch Equestrian Federation (KNHS) has led the way by
approving the crossunder bitless bridle for dressage and for certain driving
competitions. The South African National Equine Federation (SANEF) launches
a year's trial for separate bitless dressage competitions, starting in
2009.

Of course, "Dressage" originiated in the Military for use on the battlefield. The movements were taught as a means to an end. Modern "Dressage" is now just an end in itself. The "test" is pointless IMO.
 
Terry

> Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:24:34 -0800
> From: katswig@xxxxxxx
> Subject: [RC] Forced to use a bit?
> To: ridecamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Terry Bannister said about Dr. Cook's piece on the bitless bridle:
>
> > The demonstration just proved that a bit is not "needed" to perform
> > those disciplines, and should not be "forced" on those who want to
> > compete without a bit.
>
> Well....one of the purposes of a dressage test is to determine whether the rider has successfully trained the horse to accept the bit.  A bit difficult to determine this if there is no bit to accept.
>
> One of the things that is being tested is the ability of the rider to get the horse to work happily and comfortably in a bit and to use a bit as a means of communication with a horse.
>
> To me this is comparable to giving somebody a French test to see if they can communicate in French, but then allowing them to use English to communicate to see if they can communicate effectively in any language.  You give French tests in French to see if people can communicate in French, not to see if they can communicate at all.
>
> As long as "acceptance of the bit" is part of the directives for a dressage test, not using a bit is nonsensical.
>
> kat
> Orange County, Calif.
> :)
>
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
> Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp
>
> Ride Long and Ride Safe!!
>
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



Send e-mail anywhere. No map, no compass. Get your Hotmail® account now.

Replies
[RC] Forced to use a bit?, kathy swigart