Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

RE: [SPAM] RE: [RC] conformation-toed in vs. toed out - Kimberly Huck

Thank you all for the input.  What you’ve said makes sense! J

 

 


From: heidi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:heidi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 8:43 PM
To: Kimberly Huck
Cc: 'steelsidedown'; 'ridecamp ridecamp'
Subject: RE: [SPAM] RE: [RC] conformation-toed in vs. toed out

 

Would be an issue if the problem is severe, but if it is "slight" as you mentioned, it isn't likely to have much impact on long-term soundness.

 

Bad backs cause far more lamenesses than do bad legs, FWIW.

 

Heidi

 

What about long term soundness?


Replies
RE: [SPAM] RE: [RC] conformation-toed in vs. toed out, heidi