Endurance.Net Ridecamp Archives

I agree 100%.

Joe Long <jlong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm sure some folks wonder why I bother to continue to write about the
> meaning of "endurance ride" and "endurance rider" each time this
> subject comes up, as it does at least a couple of times every year.
> And some have dismissed the whole issue as "nothing but semantics" or
> "who cares what somebody calls themselves?"
>
> OK, there are several reasons why I do it. These are the two biggest:
>
> 1. An endurance ride is not a trivial thing. Riding one horse 50
> miles or more in one day may seem like no big deal to some of us "old
> timers," but it is quite a big deal to most people. It's not
> something that a person can just up and decide to do one day, grab ol'
> dobbin out of the pasture, and succeed. It is a genuine challenge
> that requires not only the native ability,
>  but preparation and
> dedication. We properly recognize and reward success at that effort.
>
> Frankly, I don't like it when people who want everything "easy" want
> to have that recognition, and those rewards, without doing what it
> takes to EARN them. Instead of showing the dedication, and doing the
> preparation, and putting forth the effort to RIDE an endurance ride,
> they want to ride half the distance and still be called "endurance
> riders." I object to that, and I will continue to object to that. It
> may be the modern "American Way" to just give everyone "recognition"
> without their having to work for it, but it's not my way.
>
> I'm sure some folks just think I'm a mean old curmudgeon because I
> won't go along with LD riders (or CTR riders or "fun run" riders)
> being considered to be "endurance riders." Well, them's the breaks.
> I'm not in a popularity contest. I will continue to defend the idea
> of setting a goal, then WORKING to achieve
>  it, rather than just saying
> you did it to feel good.
>
> 2. The AERC properly keeps endurance miles and LD miles separate. If
> we did not, no one could tell from a horse or rider's mileage stats
> how much was endurance miles, if any at all. We can keep the miles
> separate because the AERC Bylaws define an endurance ride as 50 miles
> or more per day. If we change the definition of an endurance ride to
> 25 miles or more per day, what rationale will we have for not counting
> 25 mile rides in the endurance totals? We will have further cheapened
> the sport, to where the mileage records will no longer mean much.
>
> IOW, if we don't defend the language, if we don't defend the
> definition of an endurance ride, we will be giving in to the "I want
> it easy" crowd and we will have lost something that was once quite
> precious. I think that's worth defending, even if we have to do it
> over and over again.
>
> Joe Long
> AERC #1
> Distance Rider,
>  Endurance Rider, and Marathon Runner.
>
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>
> Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
> Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp
>
> Ride Long and Ride Safe!!
>
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

---

Do you Yahoo!?
 
Get on board. You're invited to try the new Yahoo! Mail Beta.