The major problem, I had with FEI rides run
in conjunction with 'open' rides - is that FEI riders seemed to get
'preferential treatment', as far as getting though vet check(s), where
allowed to set up for vet check - they got to crew closer - to vet
check, etc. - 'think it should be first come, first served.' Ride I
am thinking of, FEI riders had first pick of 'choice' vet check areas,
(roped off for them) ; seemed to be 'fostered through' vet check lines,
when 'regular' riders seemed had to wait more, and also, take
what was left over for 'crew areas', also, trailer parking better for FEI;
and regular riders were treated almost like ' 2nd class citizens'.
This was several years ago, maybe it has changed, but left it left
'impression' / and that given choice, I probably will not go
to FEI co - sanctioned ride, if had other options. Unless,
happen to be riding FEI, which only did once - too many 'hoops' to jump
through, not my style, plus added 'expenses', and no interest in competing
international - so why bother. This was several years ago, so maybe it is
better toward 'open riders' now.?
The organization I belonged to decided
they did not want to have 'jump through the hoops' to host a FEI event, or
pay 'alot' of extra money, etc. to co - sanction, ( with little
return for money that had to put out to have ride with FEI
'status' ), but they may rethink that, as has been said,
previously, to get 100 mile enteries, almost need to co - sanction
anymore, to have adequate # 100 mile enteries,
sad.
Jmo - re: decrease in 100 mile
enteries... 'time' and money. and fewer 100's offered overall. Time to
condition, travel to ride 100 that is offered. Having 'time off' and
Money to allow time required to do either/ both. As noted,
there are fewer 100's, often further away from 'home area' -
takes days to travel to, and return. May be necessary to take week off at least
to do some.? More if plan 'cross country'. Of course all people have
to set priorities/goals, but sometimes can be two important
factors. StephanieM
