Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

Re: [RC] New Poll up - Heidi Smith

Thank you, thank you, thank you, Joe, for calling a spade a spade.  Truman,
what ARE you thinking?  This is on par with the old question "Have you
stopped beating your wife?"

No metabolic death is "acceptable" in the sense of sweeping it under the
rug--indeed, every one should be questioned and examined and hashed over and
every attempt made to understand why it happened so that we can be smarter
in preventing future ones.  But indeed, the only way to achieve zero is not
to ride.  And even then, the death rate is one apiece, and all horses will
die of something.

I personally found the death of my filly who fractured her leg out playing
and "just being a horse" to be "unacceptable."  But the only way to insulate
myself from such things would be to sell 'em all and take up knitting.

I'm not going to give this poll the dignity of a response.

Heidi

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Long" <jlong@xxxxxxxx>
To: "Truman Prevatt" <tprevatt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "AERC" <AERCMembersForum@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; "Ride Camp"
<RideCamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "enduranceriders"
<Enduranceriders2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <DR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 6:46 PM
Subject: Re: [RC] New Poll up


On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 20:20:32 -0500, Truman Prevatt
<tprevatt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Given the current discussion on various sites concerning deaths at
endurance rides, a new poll question has been put on the SERA website.
It is


   Are 10 deaths a year resulting from metabolic failure acceptable?

Let your voice be hear go vote at http://www.seraonline.org/

Truman, What the...?????????  What a loaded "poll."

What is "acceptable?"  What is the alternative?  There is a way -- and
ONLY one way -- to eliminate equine fatalities in endurance rides:
stop having endurance rides.  If someone really, truly believes that
equine fatalities resulting from endurance rides are unacceptable
(literally, "can not be accepted"), that person MUST believe that we
must stop having endurance rides.  This is a case where you cannot say
A without saying B.

If you are asking if that *number* (ten annually) is acceptable, why
that arbitrary number and no other choices?  But then, how could I or
any horseman answer that ten, or five, or one is "acceptable?"  I
think most of us would say that even one a decade is a tragedy that we
must work to minimize, while being realistic enough to know that zero
is an unreachable number.

It's like some politician asking how many traffic deaths a year are
acceptable (or how many casualties in Iraq are acceptable).

I can see no purpose behind a "poll" like this other than to
sensationalize a complex problem with a question that has no answer.
I will not participate in this "poll" and I urge others to refuse to
participate as well.

--

Joe Long
jlong@xxxxxxxx
http://www.rnbw.com


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

 Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
 Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp

 Ride Long and Ride Safe!!

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=



=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp

Ride Long and Ride Safe!!

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


Replies
[RC] New Poll up, Truman Prevatt
Re: [RC] New Poll up, Joe Long