Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

Re: [RC] LD BC?? - Barbara McCrary

Boy, do I agree with this!  I've been saying for YEARS that LD rides should be used for training, bringing back a horse from down time, for riders who do not want or are not able to ride longer distances, etc.  The LAST thing they should be is a RACE.  Literally ANY horse, conditioned or not, can do 25-35 miles, but these rides should not be used that way.  They are a great tool if used properly.
 
Barbara McCrary
Ride manager, Swanton Pacific 75/100
"The most beautiful trail in the world"
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 6:46 AM
Subject: [RC] LD BC??

If AERC ride managers use the BC form as it is now, they will have to use SPEED and WEIGHT as a factor.  4 year olds will be raced,  horses will be hurt more often, and riders will go like hell.  Now if you wish to submit to the committee that met at the convention and try again to resolve the issue of LD BC  have at it.  BUT time cannot be factor.  You must devise an overall vet parameter score that will take into consideration the horses age, experience and miles.  LD are training rides.  ASK anyone with 10,000+ miles.  And they deserve the right to be heard.  If you have not had a horse on an IV line it is difficult to fathom the guilt.  Whether you went fast or not.  So to reiterate devise a BC form that uses all the vet parameters from all the vet checks, score them and eliminate time from the equation and maybe I will whistle a new tune.  Donna

Replies
[RC] LD BC??, Wintersdwbob1