<% appTitle="Ridecamp Archives" %> Ridecamp: Re: [RC] Horse/Rider History Books re: PULL CODES
Ridecamp@Endurance.Net

[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]
Current to Wed Jul 23 17:39:28 GMT 2003
  • Next by Date: [RC] Horse Photos
  • - Jeanne Slominski
  • Prev by Date: Re: [RC] Sidedness (was Canter vs Extended Trot)
  • - heidi

    Re: [RC] Horse/Rider History Books re: PULL CODES - heidi


    >it seemed to me that this sort of code
    > was indicating that the rider was wise enough to pull his own horse, but
    > the vets would be still be able to glean some sort of information about
    > what was happening to the horse. Can anyone explain to me why  RO-L and
    > RO-M are not satisfactory to some of the membership?
    
    Barbara, while the data still has to be looked at as L or M, because the
    "RO" part has no bearing on severity, I have no problem with this if it
    massages some peoples' egos and makes them less resistant to having the
    proper pull code reported.
    
    Heidi
    
    
    
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
     Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
     Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
     Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp
    
     If you are an AERC member - PLEASE VOTE in the Director at Large 
     and By Laws Elections.
    
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    
    

    Replies
    RE: [RC] Horse/Rider History Books re: PULL CODES, Bob Morris
    Re: [RC] Horse/Rider History Books re: PULL CODES, Charles
    Re: [RC] Horse/Rider History Books re: PULL CODES, Barbara McCrary