<% appTitle="Ridecamp Archives" %> Ridecamp: Re: [RC] Horse/Rider History Books re: PULL CODES
Ridecamp@Endurance.Net

[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]
Current to Wed Jul 23 17:39:29 GMT 2003
  • Next by Date: [RC] IntNewsGroup: 2003 FEI/AERC Sanctioned Rides
  • - Lori & Rick Stewart
  • Prev by Date: Re: [RC] Pull Codes Defined
  • - Heidi Smith

    Re: [RC] Horse/Rider History Books re: PULL CODES - Jim Holland


    OK, in IMHO, here are two reasons:
    
    1. AERC has never "done anything" with the info, constructively or
    otherwise...or if they have, they have not "reported" the results to the
    membership.  Why should the members care? 
    
    2. At best, only limited "education and guidance" has been made
    available to the membership on the need for accurate reporting of the
    data, why we need it, what it will be used for, and feedback on what
    actions have been taken because of the data relative to the welfare of
    the horse. 
    
    It's sorta like voting in Florida....why bother to vote if I don't even
    know if it will be counted? <grin> No offense, T and Howard...
    
    I think a paragraph describing the pull codes, their use, and a few
    words beseeching riders and vets to be accurate, along with a sentence
    or two about their use should be on EVERY ride entry form, just like the
    disclaimer...could even make it part of it. Easy for the vets to see,
    easy for the riders to check.
    
    I would like to see a yearly report online and in EN on the number and
    percentage of horses that were pulled for each code.
    
    I would like to see a yearly report on horse deaths and at least some
    details regarding the circumstances.
    
    Want riders to report the data consistently and accurately? Give them
    something to justify their participation...horse welfare is a powerful
    tool, and I hope a primary motivator to all of us.
    
    Jim, Sun of Dimanche, and Mahada Magic
    
    
    
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Bob Morris wrote:
    
    We were starting out asking the simple basics of the cause of the horse
    being eliminated from the ride. Was the basic cause related to two
    categories? First, the Horse or the Rider? Then when that is determined,
    if the cause was the horse, the question became Lame or Metabolic? End
    of questions! Simple was it not?  Two little simple questions answerable
    by one word in each instance. Hardly takes much thought. But we cannot
    get those answers because people, for some unknown reason cannot, will
    not, do not want to, answer with one of those choices,  Again, Was the
    basic cause horse or rider. If horse, was the basic cause lameness of
    metabolic. 
     
    Now, you tell me why the membership cannot conform with such a simple
    thing. 
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
     Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
     Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
     Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp
    
     If you are an AERC member - PLEASE VOTE in the Director at Large 
     and By Laws Elections.
    
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    
    

    Replies
    RE: [RC] Horse/Rider History Books re: PULL CODES, Bob Morris