<% appTitle="Ridecamp Archives" %> Ridecamp: Re: [RC] What constitutes a start?

[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]
Current to Wed Jul 23 17:29:51 GMT 2003
  • Next by Date: Re: [RC] What constitutes a start?
  • - Randy H Eiland
  • Prev by Date: [RC] pulls and how we view them
  • - Teresa Van Hove

    Re: [RC] What constitutes a start? - Cheryl & Randy Winter

    If the idea of starting a ride is being abused, I agree <sigh> we need to
    make the rule.  Hopefully and IMO this has just been a discussion prompted
    by events that were unclear and there is no problem.
    Randy Winter
    > From: "Heidi Smith" <heidi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    > Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 18:08:18 -0600
    > To: "Cheryl & Randy Winter" <cherylrandy@xxxxxxx>, "ride camp"
    > <ridecamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <renegade12@xxxxxxxx>
    > Subject: Re: [RC]   What constitutes a start?
    > If the concept of starting is being abused, perhaps we need to rule that
    > RM's have to define and designate a physical starting point.  One would
    > think that such a concept could go without saying, but apparently not, in
    > some circles.  We used to think that finish lines would go without saying,
    > but we had to make a rule about that one, too....  <sigh>
     Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
     Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
     Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp

    Re: [RC] What constitutes a start?, Heidi Smith