Re: RC: Reply from an educated derelict

[Tivers@aol.com]

In a message dated 12/27/99 1:30:14 PM Pacific Standard Time, 
dleblanc@mindspring.com writes:

<< >Yes, but the need exists, nonetheless. It seems to me that you have the 
 >choice to snooze along until some grand poohbah makes an announcement, that 
 >is sure to be proven half wrong in another decade, or you can start trying 
 >thengs and if you find something that works, you pass on the information.
 
 Sure, but when you start getting into recommending supplement X, then you
 ought to be to a point where you can substantiate your claims of benefit
 with some solid numbers.  "My horse did better" isn't adequate.
  >>


You're confusing "claims" with basic exchange of information. Beyond the 
experiences of those doing the innovating, I have no interest in defending 
"claims". Unless, of course, by "Ivers claims" you're suggesting somehow that 
I'm a liar. Then I will defend, but I don't think that's what you mean. 

I'm not a drug company. I don't manufacture CC, and I don't, generally, sell 
it--I sell to racehorse folk. Endurance is still a big experiment in the 
works for me. My "claims" are simply reports on what is working and what 
isn't--and when CC kills a horse, I'll be the first to register that "claim" 
as well. 

ti  


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.    
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/RideCamp   
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=