Re: RC: RE: Ride vetting

["Glenda R. Snodgrass" <grs@TheNetEffect.com>]

> >Glad to discuss this further if any one is interested.
> 
> Why?  This is a non-problem.  Were it not for some personal animosities within
> one Region we wouldn't be discussing it at all.

While incidents in one Region may have prompted this discussion, I believe
it is an important issue that needs to be addressed.  I would not like to
see the AERC BOD jump to a quick-fix that required licensing of all vets
working a ride, for example, which could have unintended consequences and
negatively impact rides (like the recent 0-49 LD change), but I must
confess it disturbs me to realize that the current rules enable the AERC
to sanction a ride with *no* licensed vets onsite, is that correct?
Mayhap the situation in one Region is merely bringing to light a flaw in
the rules which has gone unnoticed up to this point.

Glenda & Lakota
Mobile, AL
AERC # M18819 & H27310
SE Region


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.    
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/RideCamp   
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=