Check it Out!    
RideCamp@endurance.net
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index] [Subject Index]

Re: Unofficial WEG team



Carlos,
all I can say is well said.Our team here was chosen at a FEI 100Miler in Hofmeyer,selection was easy,first six horses get to go.I was delighted with the horses that came in the top positions,there riders knew what they were doing.Wish I had ridden that ride.The selection process has since changed,we now work on a point system ,the same one Eldric uses.Makes more sense.
Our team is young and vibrant,its also there first International competition,am sure the rest of us will learn from what mistakes they make.I wish all the competitors the best.
Regards
Kathy*dreamming of Dubai*mm should sell another horse to get there :-)
http://196.7.177.40/aht/
-----Original Message-----
From: Carlos F. Crespo <ccrespo@nigma.com>
To: Ridecamp <ridecamp@endurance.net>
Date: Wednesday, October 14, 1998 8:19 PM
Subject: Unofficial WEG team

Rick Stewart DVM  stated that:
 
<< I respectfully submit that you, sir, are commenting
on a subject you know nothing about>>
 
Certainly I would expect nothing less from the
Chef d' Equip for the USA Equine Endurance
Team than to come to the  blind defense of the
process he is such an important part of.
 
I agree that I probably know little about the subject
but I would ask,  Who does? Other than the few
currently running the system. The entire selection
process is based on a subjective criteria
dependent  on personal opinions and done in a
totally secret and unaccountable basis. Why is it
that the opinion of each selector is not made public
as well as their voting record and the minutes of
the selection meeting process?
So long as the process is carried out in the current
fashion without full disclosure the only ones
"knowledgeable"  of the subject are those running it .
Furthermore, the lack of disclosure limits  the
"education" of the rest of the membership and
perpetuates a status quo regardless of its suitability
or acceptability by the membership.
 
The main argument I hear from you and other selectors
is that  "there is no best way to select for a team" . 
I submit to you and everyone else to consider the fact
that if there is no best way to select a team then we at
least choose a way that is the most
FAIR  TO ALL COMPETITORS.    If we are to err
I would prefer to err on the side of fairness and
participation .
 
I can not accept the argument of competitors "beating
themselves to death the year of competition being
abjectly opposite to the optimum" .
This country was build on the idea of competition.
Competition is what raises the level of performance
in all of us and gives us something greater to reach for.
Competition is what makes us great not weak.
Two selected races are not going to break any world
class horse anymore than competing in any number
of  exhibition rides , perhaps the ill effects will be even
less. 
 
I personally like the Canadian idea of defining the team
1 months in advance.  Regardless of which method is
used to define the team, sufficient time should be given
for all members to heal, train and peak for the competition
and for the coaches to learn the strengths and weaknesses
of each athlete.  With 11 months lead time any injury that
may have occurred in the qualifying race would have ample
time to heal .  This is not the case with the current system
in which nominees are expected to perform demonstration
rides until the final selection 3 months prior to the competition.
 
As for getting involved, In my view,  I am greatly involved by
developing an awareness and consciousness of the pitfall
in the system.  I have received a lot of private correspondence
in support of these views from members who agree but fear
subjective repercussion against them if they go against the
system. I for one have nothing to fear so I do not mind
leading the charge for the hearts and minds of the general
membership. That is where the decision should ultimately lie.
 
I  am not taking this time  attempting to change your believes 
or that of others defending the current process,  you are too
set in your opinion to accept the necessary changes.
 
In closing I would like to borrow from the words of a famous
poet and submit to you and the others that....
 
COMPETITION  MAKES LEGENDS .
LEGENDS  IS WHAT DREAMS ARE MADE OF. 
WHEN LEGENDS DIE THERE ARE NO LONGER DREAMS
AND WHEN  DREAMS DIE THERE IS NO LONGER
GREATNESS...
 
With regards and still sincerely wishing you success in Dubai,
 
Carlos Crespo
Florida
Keeping the Dream Alive


    Check it Out!    

Home Events Groups Rider Directory Market RideCamp Stuff

Back to TOC